Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role
Melva Corey edited this page 2 weeks ago


The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites providing both complimentary casino-style games and lucrative rewards, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to mention claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, just without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in revenue in 2015 alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city suit that claims VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions in between conventional gambling and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of lots of sweepstakes casinos discovered online
bet9ja.com
Ryan Seacrest advises fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly promotes on social networks

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social element of the gambling establishments, while leaving out the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others tempt consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement flaunting Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' check out the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The discrepancy between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for complimentary.

'Most social sweeps clients never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos use customers a chance to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to buy valueless currency typically referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open numerous functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling customers to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement revealing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but 7 states, which has assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not require typically need recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, allow customers to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are typically rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, thereby offering them a reason to try their hands at any variety of casino games for a possibility to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the complimentary casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is just a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes rewards. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference between social sweeps and conventional online gaming sites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the possibility to win financially rewarding rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't satisfy the definition of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing method for promoting all type of everyday organizations in the United States, whatever from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of sports betting market experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct beginning and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics frequently connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the typical payment portion for a short-term marketing sweepstakes is a trivial share of the revenue made by the business [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web coffee shops that emerged in Florida, providing clients the chance to play casino-style games for real prizes. A lot of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually considering that been shuttered over accusations of prohibited sports betting.

DJ Khaled is amongst several star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to face comparable examination.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state attorney general of the United States as key elements in determining that a sweepstakes promotion was in fact a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are forgoing significant tax and profits opportunities as this gambling replaces that conducted through regulated channels,' checked out a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without admitting any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent claim, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting business. '
bet9ja.com
Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as offenders in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We generally don't comment on matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has actually not been officially served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, developing not only excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the greatest level of requirements.
bit.ly
'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are fairly typical across the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we intend to vigorously protect any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The problems between standard online gaming and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76 both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against unlawful sports betting - particularly when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being taken legal action against for hosting presumably prohibited gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a responsibility to discuss to consumers the distinctions and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious prohibited gaming websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton